-----------------------------------------------------------------------
As well as the posts on this blog, check out the more frequently updated @Synodical Twitter stream, and the #Synod stream below right:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, 13 September 2010

Online Election General Synod Addresses/Statements

UPDATED WITH LINKS:

A number of folks have put their Election Addresses/Statements/Manifestos online. This page lists those that we have been informed of.

** If you are voting, please also see our post about voting too: Voting for General Synod, or General Custard.**

We will add any links to addresses online mailed to synod @ mac.com, or added in the comments below, for others to be able to access them quickly.


The prize for online- efficiency goes to the Diocese of Bath & Wells and Gloucester though, for not only having all their B&W Candidates papers and Gloucester papers on the diocesan website, but B&W are also holding an Online Hustings, up until 6 October.



Names are in alphabetical order of surname, within each house & diocese (where known):
Non-Diocesan candidates, including Suffragan Bishops, towards the bottom:
More...

Friday, 10 September 2010

Voting for General Synod, or General Custard

So, the date for confirmation of General Synod candidates is now passed, and all over England you can hear the clicking of computer keyboards and the scratching of quill-pens as candidates fine-tune their election addresses, or statements. These go to all members of Deanery Synods, the electorate for most constituencies.

Voting is by the Single Transferable Voting system; General Synod being one of the few national organisations using it for their elections. So what is STV, and how does it work? - Well the subtleties of it are way beyond my explanations; but in short, it's not just a 'put a cross in a box'. The principle is that it preserves the voters' wishes for subsequent candidates, if your first choice candidate is not elected at the first count. 


So if you have a list of 15 candidates on the ballot voting form, you don't just vote for your favourite 1. For a start, there may be 6 places to be filled (your milage may vary). 

So, Yellow Custard, or Chocolate Custard? 
If there are several Chocolate Custard fans standing for Synod, and you wish to support them, rather than the Yellow Custard fans, then for a start you must vote for them - all of them. But if there are only 5 ChocCustards, and 6 places available, then what? Well, YellowCustards may not be your favourites - but they may, in your opinion be better on Synod than the Marmite fans. So there could be advantages in making sure in general that all custard fans are ranked higher on your voting slip than the Marmiters.

Someone else has tried to summarise the principles as set out below. Me? I'm voting for the Marmiters.

  • If you have a vote, we would encourage you to use your vote fully for these candidates if you feel you can. 
  • Numbering the candidates consecutively in your order of preference is the best way of ensuring that those you want to get elected do get elected.  
  • It makes a big difference to go on voting down the preferences with a second and third and fourth choice and so on.   
  • In the past some candidates from (insert 'party' of your choice...) have failed to get elected because voters only gave a first vote, whereas some subsequent votes (second and third choices etc) would have helped some candidates get over the finishing line.   
  • The single transferable vote system which is used works in such a way that the later preferences you give in no way detract from those candidates to whom you have given earlier preferences.

Ballot papers for voting will be coming out in a week or so. Happy voting, voters!